The body of work

What has actually been built

Five projects — a nonlinear documentary, a video experience, a published StoryMap, a character compendium, and a participatory design study. Each works inside one or more of the six Reckoning in Pixels pillars.

Live

Shifting Landscapes

Land Possession/Dispossession and the Creation of Black Urban Ecologies

Immersive interactive documentary — nonlinear, built on the Klynt platform

A decolonial inquiry into the interplay between land, power, policy, culture, and resistance in the creation of ecologies of knowledge that continue to transform African American urban environments.

What Shifting Landscapes traces, pillar by pillar

Housing as Instrument in Shifting Landscapes

Force
The legal machinery of possession: Title I clearance, the lending map, and the long apparatus that decided which ground Black communities were permitted to hold and on what terms.
Consequence
Dispossession read as one continuous transfer rather than a sequence of separate events — the plantation ecology and the urban one treated as the same instrument arriving in a different century.
Evidence
Parts 2 and 3 — “The Struggle for Land and Power” and “Contested Ground” — with the transition from plantation to urban ecologies staged before them as its own excavation.

Housing as Instrument in full →

Infrastructure as Policy in Shifting Landscapes

Force
The improvements that carried the clearance and arrived under the name of progress: the routes cut, the lines drawn, the works built into ground that was already occupied.
Consequence
A landscape that now reads as terrain rather than decision. The project answers that by refusing a single authorized route through itself — its nonlinear form is the argument, not the packaging.
Evidence
Part 6, “Environmental Justice and Urban Ecology”, inside a work of nine parts that can be entered from any of them.

Infrastructure as Policy in full →

Sound & Voice as Spatial Resistance in Shifting Landscapes

Force
Containment drawn on paper, and the cultural production that never agreed to observe it.
Consequence
Culture made in opposition to a constructed reality, held as knowledge rather than as colour — the project’s founding conviction that these communities are sovereign producers of knowledge and not objects of study.
Evidence
Parts 4 and 5 — “Culture as Resilience” and “Belonging and Resistance” — and the 142-page companion document that carries the citations.

Sound & Voice as Spatial Resistance in full →

Open Shifting Landscapes → Enter the documentary ↗

Live

Amplified Extraction

The Vibrations of Resistance

Video experience

The past never really leaves us. It pulses beneath our present, not just as a memory but as a force that shapes who we are today. Themes of struggle, identity, and resilience are carried forward across generations, creating a continuous narrative that refuses to be silenced.

What Amplified Extraction traces, pillar by pillar

Sound & Voice as Spatial Resistance in Amplified Extraction

Force
A lineage used as a route. Blues into jazz into hip hop, crossing the borders and the eras that policy was drawn to make uncrossable.
Consequence
The route shown working rather than asserted: Abdullah Ibrahim’s South African jazz carrying the blues forward, and being taken up, re-timed and put to use by people in a different city and a later decade.
Evidence
The video experience itself — the piece is the demonstration, which is why it has no companion text.

Sound & Voice as Spatial Resistance in full →

Open Amplified Extraction →

Published

Urban Dispossession: Why Brooklyn?

Seven decades of coordinated dispossession, mapped

ArcGIS StoryMap

Brooklyn stands at the epicenter of urban displacement, gentrification, and state-sanctioned land dispossession in New York City. This project investigates how Brooklyn, more than any other borough, became the testing ground for development strategies that devalue Black life and extract Black wealth under the guise of progress.

What Urban Dispossession: Why Brooklyn? traces, pillar by pillar

Housing as Instrument in Urban Dispossession: Why Brooklyn?

Force
Redlining, urban renewal, rezoning and tax lien sale, examined together on the claim that they are one coordinated and evolving system rather than a run of unrelated decisions.
Consequence
The erasure of Bedford-Stuyvesant, Crown Heights and East New York, conducted throughout in administrative language — “blight”, “revitalization”, “affordable housing”.
Evidence
Seven decades traced across the three neighborhoods, in a published ArcGIS StoryMap.

Housing as Instrument in full →

Mobility as Segregation in Urban Dispossession: Why Brooklyn?

Force
Proximity to Manhattan, treated as the variable that set the price of everything else in the borough.
Consequence
Land made cheap by systemic neglect and desirable by that same nearness — the condition that made Brooklyn the testing ground rather than an ordinary casualty.
Evidence
The project’s title is the finding: “Why Brooklyn?” is answered as a political and economic question, not a geographic one.

Mobility as Segregation in full →

Infrastructure as Policy in Urban Dispossession: Why Brooklyn?

Force
Zoning and eminent domain held as instruments, with government actors and real estate capital shown acting jointly rather than in sequence.
Consequence
Coordination made visible instead of alleged, by laying policy analysis, oral history, spatial mapping and demographic data over one another until the pattern is the thing you are looking at.
Evidence
Four method layers over seven decades — the minimum of four analytical layers RIP requires of any composition.

Infrastructure as Policy in full →

Open Urban Dispossession: Why Brooklyn? →

In development

Demystifying Food Origins

Food as cultural evidence

Character compendium — 64 Food Guardians across 8 world regions

Demystifying Food Origins uses character design, agricultural history, and regional storytelling to reconnect fruits, vegetables, grains, roots, and tree crops to the people and places that sustained them. It treats food as cultural evidence while distinguishing botanical origin, cultural anchor, crop movement, and artistic interpretation.

What Demystifying Food Origins traces, pillar by pillar

Food as Empire in Demystifying Food Origins

Force
Colonial production systems and the labour arrangements that made them pay, still carried inside the crops themselves.
Consequence
The migration kept legible instead of collapsed: botanical origin, cultural anchor, crop movement and artistic interpretation are held apart on purpose, so a plant’s route is not mistaken for its home.
Evidence
64 Food Guardians across 8 world regions, each one a character carrying a crop and its passage.

Food as Empire in full →

Open Demystifying Food Origins →

Published 2022

East New York

Co-Designing Alternative Futures

Participatory design research — pilot program framework

A pilot program addressing lack of access to healthy foods, green spaces, and vulnerability to heat in New York City’s most affected areas — co-designed with public schools, students and faculty, community gardens, private businesses, and municipal organizations.

What East New York traces, pillar by pillar

Food as Empire in East New York

Force
Food apartheid as built environment rather than as consumer choice: 135 bodegas and 71 fast food outlets against 13 grocery stores in one district.
Consequence
Measured in bodies, in the community’s own figures — childhood obesity at 25% against 21% citywide, adult obesity at 35% against 24%, and 76% of adults eating one serving of fruit or vegetables a day against 87% across the city.
Evidence
Quoted from the 2022 study, with access to affordable healthy food named one of the top three needs in the Community District 5 Statement of Needs for FY2023.

Food as Empire in full →

Water as Control in East New York

Force
Heat and shade distributed the way investment was — which is to say unevenly, and along the same lines each time.
Consequence
Four community gardens doing the cooling the infrastructure does not, across 43,025 square feet, and a framework written to be duplicated rather than a fix applied to one site.
Evidence
Workshop 5, “Shade Mapping”, which puts heat vulnerability on the record at street level and in the residents’ own hands.

Water as Control in full →

Open East New York →

How the work is organized

Every project answers to a pillar

Reckoning in Pixels defines six thematic pillars. A project is not filed under a pillar as a label — the pillar states the structural force being examined and the consequence being documented, and the project has to carry both.

The pillars name instruments, not places. A case study is located because that is where the evidence was gathered and the relationships were built; the instrument it traces rarely stops where the case study does. Redlining maps were drawn for cities across the United States. The East New York framework was designed to be duplicable. The Food Guardians span eight world regions and 64 characters. Wherever you are working, the questions are portable even when the ground is not.

Read the methodology Publications in preparation Work with us on your ground
Support the work